|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Denham on November 17, 2000 at 11:10:13:
In Reply to: Re: Needs driven KM posted by Vaughn P Fox on November 16, 2000 at 00:25:55:
Is it critical to recognize what information people need to gain knowledge they require to achieve understanding, which may lead to wisdom? I find it very difficult to see how knowledge can be effectively managed without a clear recognition of what needs to be done and a clear recognition of information needed to gain knowledge.
I guess we part ways somewhere here, it may be an incorrect interpretation on my part. Seems people are very astute at determining their own needs once they have a clear idea of their roles, alignment with the company (department) purpose and stable identity. Their 'needs' may alter on exposure to news, after reflecting, self-organization or through dialog. I guess my hesitation here is around who determines the information needs, if this comes from an outsider I have doubts if this is the way to go or the ideal route to knowledge.
Is a reflection around information gap analysis useful for knowledge management? - yes, provided it is done in a community, should it be the guiding principle for KM? - hardly. Gap awareness is important, but there are other key issues at play here. Establishing an environment for experimenting, having a culture that allows failures and recognizes the power of learning from them, having open communications and a collaborative spirit, having alignment on purpose and the ability to question where we are headed.
I got the impression from reading your posting that you think managing knowledge requires people to actually transfer knowledge. For me it is not around knowledge transfer (which I too think is very problematic), it is around critique, sharing, emergence of new insights (leading to different actions), validations and conceptualizations via dialog. KM is about alignment on what knowledge means within a community, co-design of a knowledge strategy, emphasis on knowledge creation, rather than reuse for longer term viability, and leverage of group insights (and activities) via collaboration.
We may not be that far apart here.
- Re: Needs driven KM Vaughn P Fox 01:22:49 11/20/00 (2)
- Re: Needs driven KM Denham 10:29:44 11/21/00 (1)
- Re: Needs driven KM Vaughn P Fox 23:08:33 11/21/00 (0)
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA