WWW VL KM | THINK TANK | READ & RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | THINK TANK FAQ | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Tracking connections & mining workflow, drawing a line

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Denham on June 21, 1997 at 10:22:16:

In Reply to: Concern: Will participation tracking and metrics be an excuse for more surveillance in the workplace? posted by Michael Kran on June 21, 1997 at 00:59:55:

Michael,

You raise an important issue, there is a fine line between metrics and surveillance. Metrics can provide solid data to justify compensation e.g. rewarding consultants for their contributions to the knowledge repository, judging personal productivity and quality by monitoring failure to meet deadlines or counting document rework or searching for indices of proactivity e.g. contributions to meeting agendas. Recorded activities are used by corporate ethnologists to model problem solving, verify information sources or log interface tool use and abuse.

The same data can be used in different ways, 1) to suggest a more efficient way to accomplish the task (wizard) 2) to rate your competence with the tool (training needs), 3) to judge your learning ability (longitudinal comparisons).

If your personal knowledge forms part of your skill set, is a major item in setting your compensation and is the reason for hiring you in the first place (e.g. sales contacts) have you not implicitly "sold" that information to the company?

With more and more best practices & lessons learned (those KM nuggets) residing in knowledge repositories, the ability to store more in your head becomes a critical skill if you are thinking of moving. Can you ethically use this info on the other side?. Lets say its not trade secrets or magical formulae but tips on how to share knowledge, where do we draw the line?

I would be interested to explore (and expose?) where the line sits, how it shifts between occupations, the influence of mining tools and the medium on how any line is drawn.


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA

WWW VL KM | THINK TANK | READ & RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | THINK TANK FAQ | @BRINT