|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Denham on November 12, 2000 at 20:16:33:
So you have read Davenport & Prusak or Von Krogh etal, you can drag Nonaka and O'Dell & Grayson from your shelves, you are working your way through Brown & Duguid, you have ordered "How Storytelling Ignites Action in Knowledge-Era Organizations"
by Stephen Denning, the inaugral copy of "Knowledge and Innovation" the new (October 2000) journal of the KMCI has just landed on your desk, you have just returned from BrainTrust's latest conference.Now it time to survey the KM landscape:
Bottom up or top down?
Making knowledge work can be very hard if the organization itself is not prepared, does not have knowledge as part of 'the' plan, is blind to the need for opening up communications and just does not see the need to build a supportive culture of care and sanction for knowledge activities. Finding and supporting communities of practice which have no 'market', sanction or reception for their insights is a lonely road.Re-use or innovation?
Let's clean up our internal act first, capture what we know, distribute local knowledge and avoid re-invention! Often firms become stuck in first generation "supply side" KM as Mark McElroy calls it, and never make it to sustainable competitive advantage from improved innovation or increased flexibility and adaptation to the market.Technology or people?
Most firms know the answer here but do the easy one. They then wonder why ROI is low, a new fad come knocking and how to write-off those large IT expeditures.Process or practice?
We need to have a clear understanding of how knowledge will be created in this firm then make sure everyone follows the approved process!, right on - you have just lost most of the opportunity and intrinsic motivation before you get out of the starting blocks. Knowledge work defies a straight jacket and k. process optimization will lead you into the wilderness.Language or representation?
Should you concentrate on emergent concepts or automated inference? Will it be time in dialog forums or validating rule repositories that gather all the energy and funding? Do you need to pump up the ideas entering the firm or tighten up on the use of 'quack' heuristics?Social learning or knowledge portal?
Do we really need to have folks wandering around talking all day?, let's rather build a super intranet and post all the best information so employees can read and make valid decisions based on the right information just when they need it. But people need to belong, to identify, to be stakeholders, to co-create before they will trust, use, evangelise, share and understand.We need to focus here!, is a comon cry: please take your pick, customer insights, solutions to common problems, mapping what we know, building yellowpages, inventorizing [intellectual, human, structural, customer] capital, building relationships, capturing product knowledge, monitoring competitors, mining transactions, capturing web behavior.
Aha said the sage, what you need is balance, a bit here and some from there. Start small, grab the low hanging fruits, avoid enterprize wide technnology solutions, culture an ecology of communities, encourage an informal idea market, work on hiring prfiles, start new web forums that cut across silos, play with language, cultivate the emergent activists, encourage boundary spanners, staunch the IC outflow through professional networks by listening to frustrations, always watch the outfield, make business intelligence & customer knowledge everyones job, listen to newbies, kill loosers fast......
OK test yourself:
Do we recognize and value knowledge creation (innovation)?
Do we reward learning (even from failure?)
Do we match quality talent with quality ideas?
Do we cultivate relationships and care for intellectual diversity?
Do we encourage deep dialog and can we discover key business rules?
And who ever said KM was easy?
- Re: KM strategy, where to now? to Here AND to There Daan de Koning 10:55:34 11/17/00 (0)
- Re: KM strategy, where to now? Vaughn P Fox 23:42:08 11/14/00 (6)
- Needs driven KM Denham 08:48:48 11/15/00 (5)
- Re: Needs driven KM Vaughn P Fox 00:25:55 11/16/00 (4)
- Re: Needs driven KM Denham 11:10:13 11/17/00 (3)
- Re: Needs driven KM Vaughn P Fox 01:22:49 11/20/00 (2)
- Re: Needs driven KM Denham 10:29:44 11/21/00 (1)
- Re: Needs driven KM Vaughn P Fox 23:08:33 11/21/00 (0)
- Re: KM strategy, where to now? Kaipa Amar 06:59:38 11/13/00 (0)
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Contact Us | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA