ARTICLES | KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.

Re: The ethics of knowledge management in a conflict situation


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Daan de Koning on October 24, 2000 at 06:05:04:

In Reply to: Re: The ethics of knowledge management in a conflict situation posted by Vaughn P Fox on October 23, 2000 at 13:36:09:

Vaughn,

I do think that KM is always a useful part of conflict management.

When applying Knowledge Management in a conflict situation, it is effective to take into account the culture, emotions, ethics, religion and morality of (all) the parties involved in the conflict. Simply because each decision and action in a conflict, may lead to a reaction that is based on these factors. Gaining information of these factors and use them in the decision making process is benefitial for those who do.

I don't think we disagree on that.

What we (might?) disagree upon is the following,
I do think that:

the appliance of Knowledge Management will not lead BY ITSELF to a morally 'sound' solution of a conflict.

The use of KM in Conflict Management itself is neither moral nor immoral.

The use of KM will benefit those parties in a conflict that do use it, they will improve their winning probabilities.

A conflict is characterized by the absence of any foundation of trust and therefor the impossibility to establish a set of rules/standards because there is a fundamental difference in ethics.

In my view, the 'soundness' of decisions and actions is determined by the extend to which the results of these decisions and actions meet a predefined objective.

A criminal can apply knowledge management in performing crime very succesfully (that is, get the benefits without getting caught by the police nor being brought to justice). His succesfull application of knowledge management, doesn't make his acts moral or ethical or less criminal.

Likewise in conflict management. Applying KM wil not make the results more or less moral or ethical.

That's what I mean with 'KM is morally neutral'.

I am very interested in your thoughts on these matters.

Regards
Daan de Koning





Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Current Discussion ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA