ARTICLES | KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.

Re: The ethics of knowledge management in a conflict situation


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Vaughn P Fox on October 23, 2000 at 13:36:09:

In Reply to: The ethics of knowledge management in a conflict situation posted by Daan de Koning on October 23, 2000 at 04:28:17:

Daan de Koning,
If you are saying that effective knowledge management can assist people to assess the probability of winning, to determine potential of improving this probability, and making decisions that influences the level of desire to allocate resources that achieve expected results...then we are in agreement.
It is my impression that ethics and morality are usually tethered to most decisions, even if those decisions are not influencing results in a conflict management environment. Before anyone makes a decision, they normally possess knowledge, then apply objective reasoning and judgment against knowledge gained to achieve a level of understanding they need to make a decision. I would venture to say that people making decisions in a CM environment (more often than not) consider cultural and ethnic concerns before making decisions. Knowledge assists them to gain an appreciation of those concerns. The key point that I was trying to make in the previous threaded postings (which may not have been clearly articulated) is that effective KM is critical for people desiring to make sound decisions, whether they are making a decision in a CM environment or in any other environment. I hope this explanation is clearly understood.
I got the impression from reading your posting that you think KM does not address or consider ethics or morality. If you can show me effective KM without rules/standards established by commonly understood ethics used to form a foundation of trust, then I will buy you a beer or soda your choice. If my impression of your posting is correct, than you and I are not thinking alike with respects to KM. I hope my impresssion is wrong. Looking forward to be corrected. Respectfully, Vaughn.




Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Current Discussion ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA