Posted by Robert Benjamin on September 17, 2000 at 11:36:04:

In Reply to: Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? posted by Ron de Weijze on September 16, 2000 at 09:53:59:

Hi Ron

Thanks. Hope your weekend was good as well. Read your response with interest. If I understood you correctly, it seems we may have completed another in a series of circular discussions. Could we perhaps summarize with a Maslowian outlook? Globalization and collaboration be damned, until such time as I have had my fill.

I am afraid selfless collaboration does not fall within the top 5 human traits, although cases of such exist. Guess we need that stimulus, that common bond or effect to enable us to pull together in the same direction. Such coomon ground should form the basis of social cohesion. Do you think that, in knowledge alone, the common bond could be strong enough for dynamic, cross-cultural co-operation? Let's exclude common friends and enemies, threats and opportunities, from this equation for argument sake.

Regards,

Robert

Hopefully, there are many more

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Ron de Weijze 19:23:57 09/17/00 (2)
  • Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Robert Benjamin 09:12:31 09/18/00 (1)
    • Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Ron de Weijze 02:46:34 09/26/00 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: