Posted by Ron de Weijze on September 09, 2000 at 17:10:18:

In Reply to: Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? posted by Robert Benjamin on August 02, 2000 at 08:11:26:

Fully agree, Robert,

However in the process we should be very careful about particular social structures. Reducing the higher functional structures of society and cultural groups to related objects calls for resistance. When the structures were built from individual and independent confirmation that will be negligible since new ones can be built just as easily. On the other hand, when they were formed by mechanisms of mimetics, dependent conformation, initiation rites, gatekeeping, groupsism etc. - then these group members are untouchables.

Ron.

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Robert Benjamin 02:05:42 09/10/00 (5)
  • Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Ron de Weijze 09:53:59 09/16/00 (4)
    • Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Robert Benjamin 11:36:04 09/17/00 (3)
      • Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Ron de Weijze 19:23:57 09/17/00 (2)
        • Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Robert Benjamin 09:12:31 09/18/00 (1)
          • Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Ron de Weijze 02:46:34 09/26/00 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: