|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Ron de Weijze on September 09, 2000 at 16:37:07:
In Reply to: Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? posted by Andy on August 02, 2000 at 06:46:13:
Re: …people do not know enough about how to extract knowledge from situation and experiences. It seems to me particular in the society and cultural groups that it has been frowned upon the art of reflection and contemplation of ideas and philosophies.
Why would that be so?
Because in society and groups are just for canvassing. Because situations and experience change so fast it is no use trying to extract knowledge from them. Because the knowledge is merely polite (tacit/fuzzy) agreement. Because the knowledge needs protection as an honorable code. For example not using God's name. Because the knowledge needs protection as a dishonorable code. For example empowering the scapegoat mechanism (mimetics, prof. René Girard). Because… Ron dW
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA