|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by John Tieso on August 26, 2000 at 14:43:43:
In Reply to: Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? posted by Robert Benjamin on August 24, 2000 at 03:49:37:
Robert:
Actually, i think the problem is not with options, or the lack thereof, but the need to be abel to analyze options in tersm of some common denominator or method that allows comparision of apples to apples rather than apples to oranges.
Applying rigor--method and structure of analysis--to a problem provides that analysis capability and lends credence to the result.
Adopting an unstructured method, provides unstructured results that cannot be analyzed well.
I am not saying that a particulr structured approach, methodology or technique are required--only that, in my view, structure--rigor--is necessary.
Good day!
- Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Robert Benjamin 02:19:21 08/28/00 (0)
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA