Posted by Robert Benjamin on August 14, 2000 at 01:18:30:

In Reply to: Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? posted by John Tieso on August 10, 2000 at 21:46:18:

Hi John

The similarity between BPR and this technique is the fact that it is structured. Structured does not mean 100% sequential though, but relational in this case.

The difference between BPR and this technique is its departure point. This technique maintains that business processes are a derivement of function and data, as opposed to being a determinent in itself. Reverese engineering options exist though, but people don't have the brainpower to complete such a job accurately in a very short period of time, which is what customers want.

Regards

Robert

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? John Tieso 21:52:14 08/23/00 (5)
  • Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Robert Benjamin 15:40:22 08/24/00 (4)
    • Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? John Tieso 14:39:21 08/26/00 (3)
      • Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Robert Benjamin 02:27:11 08/28/00 (2)
        • Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? John Tieso 08:31:46 08/28/00 (1)
          • Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? Robert Benjamin 16:50:45 08/28/00 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: