ARTICLES | KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.

Re: Knowledge engineering


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Current Discussion ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Reilly Atkinson on August 10, 2000 at 13:53:48:

In Reply to: Re: Knowledge engineering posted by Robert Benjamin on August 07, 2000 at 02:55:55:

Robert -- Ultimately my take on "responsibility" is that the student is the only person who can organize and memorize material or procedures in their mind. And internal organizing and memorization are the keys to learning.(Just to be clear, I'm not citing rote memorization, but rather the general idea of storing for future recall) You can never ensure that somebody else will do something, and that, of course, includes ourselves.

Whether you are teaching abstract philosophy of science, company inventory procedures, or HTML, the effective teaching methods are the same: tell them what they are to learn, tell them what they are learning, tell them what they have learned. And, most importantly, provide time for practice and exploration in whatever ways seem fit; help them over the rough spots, sometimes dispense wisdom, sometimes play Socrates, "push and shove" and give a gentle hand. Don't suffer fools, and don't lionize the over achievers; get the quick learners to help others.....Watch, listen and help, help, help(sometimes help is doing nothing). In other words, be there.

It's all about helping a human being, sharing what you have. It's not so much about styles of learning as it is about styles of being a person. Don't worry about "knowledge engineering". (Whatever it is, and that seems to change, it is jargon-based, and gets in the way of clear precise thinking, by imposing restrictive patterns of thinking and inquiry.I will admit a bias here. Even with a lot of computer experience and a Ph.D. in theoretical physics, I could never make heads nor tales of most of the AI literature. I'm in good company on that one.) Just use your intuition and common sense, and/or that of others.

Enough.

Reilly


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Current Discussion ] [ Discussion Index ]

Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA