|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Denham on August 02, 2000 at 09:26:51:
In Reply to: Re: what's the way to represent tacik knowledge of an enterprise? posted by Robert Benjamin on August 02, 2000 at 08:11:26:
Robert,
As someone who has been down that road let me share a few pointers. There are some very elegant methods to capture, extract, structure, relate and even represent explicit knowledge. Knowledge aquisition and elicitation techniques are well documented from subtle ways to work around cognitive blocks, think aloud and playback protocols, qualitative modeling (AHP) to the surfacing of deep constructs e.g. using repertoire grids. We can represent declarative and relational information using rules, logic and more.
Much of this route seems to miss the mark for me. Let me explain. Knowledge mostly lives in the tacit form (what we know and cannot tell) the key to working with knowledge is to feed the tacit wellspring to keep the explicit part flowing. What tends to happen, is we put far too attention to making implicit knowledge explicit and do not pay attention to learning, stimulation, awareness, indentity and recognition, reflection and social situatedness to keep that extract from becoming brittle and degrading.
It is not how to extract or represent that is the bottleneck, it is the nurturing , learning, incremental development, refication and sharing the meaning after capture that is key
- Re: Knowledge engineering Ron de Weijze 07:47:26 09/17/00 (0)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Robert Benjamin 01:52:28 08/03/00 (24)
- Re: Knowledge engineering John Tieso 21:30:28 08/10/00 (1)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Robert Benjamin 01:14:55 08/14/00 (0)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Andy 05:09:48 08/04/00 (21)
- Re: Knowledge engineering John Tieso 21:34:06 08/10/00 (0)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Robert Benjamin 09:23:02 08/04/00 (19)
- Re: Knowledge engineering John Tieso 21:35:48 08/10/00 (8)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Robert Benjamin 01:35:31 08/14/00 (7)
- Re: Knowledge engineering John Tieso 21:42:04 08/23/00 (6)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Robert Benjamin 02:59:17 08/25/00 (5)
- Re: Knowledge engineering John Tieso 14:32:30 08/26/00 (4)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Robert Benjamin 02:56:03 08/28/00 (3)
- Re: Knowledge engineering John Tieso 08:41:04 08/28/00 (2)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Robert Benjamin 16:49:04 08/28/00 (1)
- Re: Knowledge engineering John Tieso 22:18:15 08/28/00 (0)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Reilly Atkinson 15:53:13 08/04/00 (9)
- Re: Knowledge engineering John Tieso 21:38:20 08/10/00 (0)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Robert Benjamin 02:55:55 08/07/00 (7)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Reilly Atkinson 13:53:48 08/10/00 (3)
- Re: Knowledge engineering John Tieso 21:40:21 08/10/00 (0)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Reilly Atkinson 13:57:53 08/10/00 (1)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Robert Benjamin 01:22:11 08/14/00 (0)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Andy 08:56:21 08/07/00 (2)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Reilly Atkinson 13:20:46 08/10/00 (1)
- Re: Knowledge engineering Andy 10:56:56 08/11/00 (0)
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA