|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Ron de Weijze on July 10, 2000 at 17:12:17:
In Reply to: Re: Where KM Strategies Succeed posted by Robert Benjamin on July 10, 2000 at 06:34:56:
Thank you for always responding Robert, you are the politest among us. I think I get your drift now. If I understand right, you are saying that fuzziness = individual uniqueness and unpredictability. I quite agree. However I believe that the method is standardized as the human genome. As a kid, did you never look twice into the curtains of your bedroom if you thought the first time you saw a face, to make sure you what you were seeing was right? That is establishing reliability right there already. And did you not test the validity of what your parents had told you, growing up? There again. So the individual nature of km is in all of us, yet it is the method that science explicited (sp?). All our knowledge = con-science.
Thanks!
Ron.
- Re: Where KM Strategies Succeed Robert Benjamin 05:31:22 07/11/00 (0)
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA