Posted by Ron dW on June 10, 2000 at 10:10:39:

In Reply to: Re: Where KM Strategies Succeed posted by Robert Benjamin on June 01, 2000 at 02:25:10:

Hi Robert,

I believe I understand your concern. There are so many parameters, fair and unfair ones, that we cannot control for them and rule out the sources of invalidity. I would like to see km as a science, starting from at least partially explicit principles, plain and simple, and systematically impacting practice. That is different from turning any field praxis into "principle" and categorizing them according to their usefulness for us.

Best,
Ron.

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: Where KM Strategies Succeed Robert Benjamin 10:33:57 06/13/00 (6)
  • Re: Where KM Strategies Succeed Denham 13:34:08 06/13/00 (5)
    • Re: Where KM Strategies Succeed Robert Benjamin 08:02:04 06/14/00 (4)
      • Re: Where KM Strategies Succeed Ron de Weijze 11:20:51 07/08/00 (3)
        • Re: Where KM Strategies Succeed Robert Benjamin 06:34:56 07/10/00 (2)
          • Re: Where KM Strategies Succeed Ron de Weijze 17:12:17 07/10/00 (1)
            • Re: Where KM Strategies Succeed Robert Benjamin 05:31:22 07/11/00 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: