KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.

Re: Model for a Knowledge Audit


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Denham on March 21, 2000 at 12:20:38:

In Reply to: Re: Model for a Knowledge Audit posted by Jason Rudgley on March 21, 2000 at 10:59:59:

Greetings Jason,

Mapping tacit knowledge is always a hit & miss affair as most times the people who posess true tacit knowledge do not know they have it!. The best way to track tacit knowledge is to compile a social network by asking which people are approached for what topics. Typical questions are:

Who do you go to for help, advice, news, information?
Who has helped you when you could not find the information?
Who knows the shortcuts and ways to get things done around here?
Who is most aware of important changes that influence your work?
People who 'know' where & how to focus their attention are another target source

I find it helps to separate tacit knowledge from implicit knowledge. Implicit knowledge consists of lists, steps, cheatsheets, notes, directories, reminders i.e. information that can be distributed via documents or explained in detail, tacit knowledge is about 'feelings', hunches, intuition, personal associations between clues and cures. There is always a gap between what has been written, recorded, explained or stored and what is still waiting to be 'written-up' that is key in this mapping exercise. Finding tacit knowledge is difficult, putting a financial asset value on tacit knowledge holdings is almost impossible. The place to focus on with your audit is the key competencies and mental models that allow the firm to compete. Tools that claim to 'mine' e-mail and other electronic message media for 'hidden' tacit knowledge really operate in the implicit knowledge area.

Good luck.




Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA