Posted by Daan de Koning on March 17, 2000 at 08:19:53:

In Reply to: Re: Agreed! posted by Kees de Vos on March 15, 2000 at 17:14:08:

Indeed KM and the debates about KM are ubiquitous, general and diffuse

..... and therefor without scope, superficial and multi-interpretable.

at least, when a situation driven a posteriori approach is used.

Knowledge itself seems to be immeasurable, only the effect knowledge has on the environment it is applied to, can be meassured. Knowledge is in organisational studies, what a 'black hole' is in science.

Being 'transformed' to manager, since January this year (that's why I no longer visit this forum as frequently as I did), I found out (the hard way, through client feedback) that it is EXPERIENCE that has value.

Where has someone been, and for how long, and what has someone done there. That is what proofs someones qualities, compentence and value.

Managing knowledge comes down to (simply) managing work/experience.

Kind regards
Daan de Koning

---

Follow Ups:

• It's not about right or wrong,.... Kees de Vos 06:08:21 03/20/00 (4)
  • DO NOT STOP THERE...... Daan de Koning 10:19:59 03/20/00 (3)
    • Re: I didn't (repost) Kees de Vos 08:05:55 03/21/00 (0)
    • Re: o.k. :) Kees de Vos 11:14:46 03/20/00 (1)
      • Re: o.k. :) & I didn't stop there Daan de Koning 09:44:42 03/22/00 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: