KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.

Re: Innovation and KM (why can't we accept fuzziness?)


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Kees de Vos on January 24, 2000 at 04:14:29:

In Reply to: Innovation and KM posted by Yalvora on January 21, 2000 at 10:34:56:

Hi Yalvora,

I believe you are referring to a message I posted a while back, http://www.brint.com/wwwboard/messages/5790.html.

On the subject of innovation my view is that the best metaphor I came across was that of reconfiguring Lego (tm) pieces and making sense of what is created. The Lego pieces in question can be viewed as the blocks which makes up ones perception of reality.

So there are two important steps; the reconfiguration bit. The willingness and ability to rethink your view of reality.
The second bit is the interpretation bit, the ability and willingness to make sense of the new constellation. This bit is very important and often underestimated. As good sense making involves getting the new view accepted it is quite often that the best innovations strike us as being rather obvious (The "Now Why Didn't I Think of That" element).

I believe it's what Einstein meant with "I am standing on the shoulders of Giants", others had come up with the building blocks, Einstein merely saw himself as the one that made sense of it in a new constellation.

Now to come back to your message, the way in which these two processes are facilitated are hard to define or optimize. Discussion might be one (for example to sow the seeds of doubt of the correctness of ones view of reality) but sitting in a bath going over a problem might be a good way to create a Eureka moment as well :). It might even come from a bit of missing data, which makes all the lines between data, information knowledge and innovation fuzzy again. Interesting question might be why can't we just accept the fuzziness and work on that basis...

Hope this helps, kind regards,

Kees de Vos.



Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA