|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Denham on January 22, 2000 at 16:00:36:
In Reply to: KM -- Why Bother? posted by Reilly Atkinson on January 20, 2000 at 21:21:12:
Reilly asks, >>"why not call "knowledge aquisition" by its traditional and euphonious name, learning." There is a difference and a distinction between knowledge acquisition, as the term is used in by the artificial intelligence community and learning. Let's explore:
Knowledge acquisition:
Most often refers to the elicitation (gathering, extraction, validation) of rules and personal heuristics (tips, tricks, rule of thumb) used to build qualitative models for decision support. There is usually no training or self-adaptive function here. Common examples are rule-based expert systems for helping with complex scheduling or configuation issues.Learning:
The ability of a system to adjust to novel inputs and to improve with practice and exposure to continuous inputs. Such systems can learn by being trained e.g. neural networks or via credit assignment and selection e.g. genetic algorithms. Learning often means there is the ability to autonomously adjust the (internal) representation and some way to score or judge the outcome.It is difficult to imagine that one can have knowledge acquisition without some level of learning when humans are involved, but when we refer to artificial systems e.g. software agents or workflow routing, this is a very fundamental distinction. I agree we need to avoid obscure terms but recognize the power and the utility of creating distinctions that matter and clarify meaning as a useful knowledge and communication practice.
- Re: Knowledge acquisition & learning Reilly Atkinson 01:59:10 01/23/00 (3)
- On 'Artificial' and 'Real' Learning Yogesh Malhotra 19:07:49 01/23/00 (2)
- Re: On 'Artificial' and 'Real' Learning Reilly Atkinson 16:11:55 01/25/00 (1)
- Re: On 'Artificial' and 'Real' Learning Yogesh Malhotra 22:05:49 01/25/00 (0)
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA