KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Re: Information Overload


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Reilly Atkinson on November 07, 1999 at 21:29:09:

In Reply to: Re: Information Overload posted by Denham on November 07, 1999 at 09:59:17:

Denham -- While I may be pushing a string in a slightly different direction than yours, I can assert with minimal equivocation that information overload for humans is an established empirical fact. This research has lead to the Rule of Seven - your short term memory cannot easily handle more than seven words or numbers or ideas or .. for quick memorization or analysis. The work of experimental psychologists and cognitive scientists has been very effectively used by the well known Prof. E. Tufte (Princeton) in his books and seminars on effective graphical presentation -- surely a form of knowledge management, building more effective languages.

During the 1960s the Air Force and the commercial airlines did a large number of pilot information and oveload studies. Some of these were done at Tufts in the Human Factors Engineering Dept., and I was fortunate enough to be a kibitzer. A lot of this work came out in Gov. reports, quite a bit came out in papers in various IEEE journals. The point of the studies was to determine how much and what data/information could a pilot actually use. At what point did the level of input become a danger? How did the pilot, or pilot copilot team make decisions? Researchers put decision making under a microscope to see how "it" worked in great detail. This research played a non trivial role in the development of the automated air-to-air collision warning system TCAS -- what mode of presentation, how much and what info, how much automation to use and so forth.As far as I know, this type of research still goes on.

I bring this up as it strikes me as an example of empirically driven "knowledge managment" for life and death situations -- for commercial and military aircraft. Perhaps this empirical approach might yield some positive benefits.

What do you do when all your filtering still leaves you with thousands of pages to digest, evaluate and to make sense of?

Regards
Reilly


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA