|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Kees de Vos on November 01, 1999 at 20:11:10:
In Reply to: Still, why? posted by Reilly Atkinson on November 01, 1999 at 16:11:56:
Hi Reilly,
distinguishing between KM and IM makes as much sense as distinguishing between top and bottom quarks :).
The sensemaking is derived from the context in which it is used. If you are repairing your car there is no need to distinguish between them is there? So let my put the question back to you:
Why (and more specifically when) is it important to make the distinction between top and bottom quarks...?So see my point? It's all contingcy; sometimes it's worthwhile and sometimes it isn't.
Sorry to sound like the management consultant I am :-).
Best regards, and forgive my youthfull cheekyness,
Kees de Vos.
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA