KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Re: Still, why?


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Denham on November 01, 1999 at 17:12:20:

In Reply to: Still, why? posted by Reilly Atkinson on November 01, 1999 at 16:11:56:

Well Reilly,

I'm not seeing much outsourcing of KM in the marketplace, where this is mostly taking place is around helpdesks. What happens most often, is that KM migrates away from IM within the firm. Sometimes this is due to IM / IT having their hands full trying to install or tame their architecture and apps, mostly it is because the KM leaders and champions come from other departments and IT just does not get the people side of collabortion and sharing. Perhaps it is an interest / motivation thing, traditional IT folk IMO just do not seem to get very excited about organizational learning, sharing, making meaning, supporting identities, gathering and taking intellectual capital and other intangibles to the market.

I agree there are IT shops that have made the transition and shift to KM, but they are few and far between (mainly Notes driven) and their focus remains technology, application programming and document or multimedia centric.

Why make a distinction, (not a separation!) between KM & IT?, for me the focus is different, the issues and opportunities are not the same, the interventions are dissimilar, the goals and reasons behind the work (drivers) come from separate planets, the skills, sensitivities, competencies and motivations needed, show a wide divergence and IM / IT folk just have a hard time with KM, it is not an easy, natural or wished for, transition for the staff. Simply it also makes pratical sense in terms of my consulting business and how company leadership sees things.

Seems there is ample evidence the market believes these are different animals too, judging by the number of KM, LO and OD conferences, books and training courses. I think it is hard to deny there is something in the wind, is some of it market hype?, you bet, is there some artificial niche creation and segmentation?, sure thing, is there a fundamental underlying shift underway?, I believe so.


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA