Posted by C. J. Sekhar on September 28, 1999 at 10:43:37:

In Reply to: Re: Salute! #1 posted by Reilly Atkinson on September 28, 1999 at 01:29:03:

I must confess that my hands tremble as I write this. Mr. Reilly’s post this morning hit my like a thunder bolt.

A few days ago, my wife, who is a practicing mathematecian, pointed out to me that Mr. Cahill’s theory sets under Bertrand Russell’s work in logicism which shows that all of mathematics is a form of logic. This was set out in his Principles of Mathematics, and later in more detail in Principia Mathematica. As a mathematician myself, I saw immediately that this was true. Therefore, there is no doubt in my mind that all of mathematics falls to Mr. Cahill’s theory. If this is so, then all of disciplines that can be expressed mathematically automatically fall.

Then I read Mr. Cahill’s post to Mr. Muncie where he shows that his theory manipulates knowledge about constancy … “the pure inner idea”. Since then, I have worked out several hundred language Triads of various kinds, and I was beginning to get a very strange feeling. Just as Mr. Reilly says, “I have the suspicion that any element of knowledge that can be described in language can be mapped into a triadic representation”. I believe that Mr. Reilly is correct.

If all science, mathematics and language can be expressed in this triadic way, it strikes me as very mysterious … eerie in a way. All things are united.

I will post my Triads if it will do any good.

C. J. Sekhar

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: Wonder (and possible UTK test) Kees de Vos 16:56:01 9/28/99 (3)
  • Re: Wonder (and possible UTK test) mike cahill 20:13:20 9/28/99 (2)
    • Learning styles and UTK? L.Grohn 03:17:58 9/29/99 (1)
      • Re: Learning styles and UTK? mike cahill 15:20:41 9/29/99 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: