Posted by mike cahill on September 26, 1999 at 23:50:17:

In Reply to: UTK -- A Challange posted by Reilly Atkinson on September 24, 1999 at 17:34:09:

I am going to give my appraisal of the UTK situation as I see it now. I want to move on, there is much more to be shown, especially in business applications. But I also want anyone who is left out there in cyber space to give me thumbs down if they wish. Here is what I see:

1. The UTK has been public for a few weeks.

2. No one has shown that any epistemologist ever conceived that all knowledge is unified with the precision and purity of The UTK. No epistemologist has even come close. If you think so, SHOW IT NOW.

3. No one has shown any type of knowledge that The UTK can not deconstruct. If you have one, SHOW IT NOW. And PLEASE do not trifle by giving me the Book of Job, or long lists of names and other disciplines, etc. etc. If you have an attack on The UTK, you would do well to read Muncie's recent post. It is reasoned and potent. He did his home work.

Best
Mike

Copyright 1999
Michael J. Cahill
CA Associates
San Jose, CA
T - 408-978-2512
F - 408-448-3940
Mobile - 408-504-8378
caintel@concentric.net

---

Follow Ups:

• The power of UTK? L.grohn 03:54:17 9/28/99 (3)
  • Re: The power of UTK? mike cahill 19:29:56 9/28/99 (2)
    • Re: The power of UTK? L.Grohn 03:07:37 9/29/99 (1)
      • Re: The power of UTK? mike cahll 15:17:05 9/29/99 (0)
• Re: TRYING TO MOVE ON Mezei 21:53:22 9/27/99 (2)
  • Re: TRYING TO MOVE ON mike cahill 22:55:28 9/27/99 (1)
    • Re: TRYING TO MOVE ON Mezei 16:33:03 9/28/99 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: