Posted by mike cahill on September 24, 1999 at 11:30:22:

In Reply to: Re: Shall I Move Ahead? re de Koning's Formalization posted by Daan de Koning on September 24, 1999 at 11:13:11:

I see no reason why any serious definitions of causation can not all fit within UTK. My contribution is to recognize that causation is the heart of knowledge and to express it. I do not, nor did I ever, think I invented causation. Your point is well taken however. In its final form the UTK paper will clarify this issue.

Re applications. We will have more of them as soon as we put out the brushfires that wish to burn the foundation. Will you be satisfied with setting KM on a rational basis for NOW?

Re Porter. Is my request for professional goal tenders irrational? Why should I do the work and the drawings for this forum, if this forum can not pull in the professional expertise to refute them with power?

I am thinking about this. We seem to lack the resources to provide serious resistance to a Porter superconstruction. Can the editor help? Or is this simply beyond the scope of Brint's Think Tank?

Thanks,
mike

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: Please Move This Thread to Network Forums editor 13:08:38 9/24/99 (1)
  • Re: Please Move This Thread to Network Forums mike cahill 15:51:56 9/24/99 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: