KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Re: Final Version of UTK


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Mezei on September 24, 1999 at 10:04:03:

In Reply to: Final Version of UTK posted by mike cahill on September 24, 1999 at 02:40:30:

Although you seem to have caused some consternation on the Forum Mike, and you could probably benefit from a lesson or two in etiquette, you definition about a UTK is correct. What you've outlined is the basic process/form that knowledge either uses, or follows (sometimes its hard to distinguish) within our observable universe. So I can see why you are excited about it.

Although I can't post models to this site (don't have the resources), the process you've outlined is exactly the same (at least I can interpret it that way) as the basic premise of knowledge flow which I arrived at. However, what you have to do next is actually define, or give some concrete examples of how this process unfolds.

For example, here's one of mine. The three step process of change is described as a bar-magnet. A positive pole, and a negative pole, and the distance between poles. So you have an initial state, which can be + or - (say + for this case), a sequence of transformations which turn this + state into a - state. Simple, 1,2,3. Matter, elevated to mind, elevated to spirit, or vice versa. Polarity, elevated to phenomena, elevated to causality.

Now the interested thing is that each end point, ie + or -, can or is also elaborated upon as a triad. The essential point is that the triads are static definitions of these endpoints, or states (+/-), and that the range of transformations between them are undefined, except to call it MIND or PHENOMENA. So a UTK defines the outer limits of knowledge, it doesn't actually define what knowledge 'is' per se, but infers what knowledge appears to look like. The great quest for a UTK is really, as in Lao Tzu words, to head west, we must go east. The closest we can come to defining knowledge is to capture the outer limits, but the flow itself is, until now, beyond our scope.

Don


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA