|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by mike cahill on September 23, 1999 at 18:25:29:
Daan de Koning has quietly worked out a preliminary formal statement of the UTK at:
"two ways of using UTK - Daan de Koning 18:07:25 9/21/99"
I am answering him here:
I have studied your post for two days.
As I understand it, it very strongly supports the Triadic concept as it is asserted in the UTK, but unfortunately I do not see that it accounts for the idea that each of the Elements in a Triad is also a Knowledge Object, subject to the same RPO deconstruction. Since this is the key to UTK's ability to embrace all knowledge, it must be in there somehow. It appears as though it will not be hard to put it in.
What do you think?
It seems important to me that these issues be clarified, because I am going to build a huge castle on what I am confident is a TOTALLY irrefutable theory. I am personally going to put my reputation on the line in several days by explaining to one of the worlds most renowned Business Strategists that his excellent work is only a subset of a logically superconstructed whole.
MY QUESTION IS: Does anyone find anything about UTK that they wish to dispute?
Best
MikePS - In any case, I will begin the work on Porter if forum members can bring in a few Strategic Planners so we can play against some serious goal keepers.
- Re: Shall I Move Ahead? re de Koning's Formalization Daan de Koning 11:13:11 9/24/99 (3)
- Re: Shall I Move Ahead? re de Koning's Formalization mike cahill 11:30:22 9/24/99 (2)
- Re: Please Move This Thread to Network Forums editor 13:08:38 9/24/99 (1)
- Re: Please Move This Thread to Network Forums mike cahill 15:51:56 9/24/99 (0)
- Final Version of UTK mike cahill 02:40:30 9/24/99 (9)
- Re: Final Version of UTK Mezei 10:04:03 9/24/99 (2)
- Re: Final Version of UTK mike cahill 10:36:53 9/24/99 (0)
- Re: Final Version of UTK (2) Mezei 10:24:30 9/24/99 (0)
- Triad of ALL definitions? L.Grohn 03:30:33 9/24/99 (5)
- Re: Triad of ALL definitions? mike cahill 09:49:38 9/24/99 (4)
- Re: Triad of ALL definitions? L.Grohn 10:08:21 9/24/99 (3)
- Re: Triad of ALL definitions? mike cahill 10:46:30 9/24/99 (0)
- Could this be it? Daan de Koning 10:46:04 9/24/99 (1)
- Re: Could this be it? mike cahill 10:54:05 9/24/99 (0)
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA