KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Re: Curious about Knowledge Management


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Vaughn P. Fox on September 20, 1999 at 00:24:48:

In Reply to: Re: Curious about Knowledge Management posted by Daan de Koning on September 19, 1999 at 15:44:07:

Daan,
What is your definition of IM? If IM is defined as managing information that provides knowledge needed to attain the level of understanding people need to make sound, timely decisions...why then are people focused on KM?

If KM is luring people together to share thoughts and ides, then KM is not what we should be focused on. Yes, sharing thoughts and ideas is important, but how do you focus those thoughts, ideas and time to produce the level of understanding needed to make key corporate decisions?

Effective IM solutions need to look not only at systematic results, but additionally systematic results influenced by objective reasoning. Whenever judgement and intuition enter the picture, there is the "artsy" part of the equation that often cannot be measured...but it can be gained and used advantageously if "intent" is clearly understood. Most people produce and share "quality" information w/ those that need it in a timely manner IF they clearly understand the intent. Yes...it is not that simple, but almost. Leadership, ethics, initiative, common sense,...they all have a role in supporting effective IM. That role is often guided by rules called "procedures". When is the last time you entered an organization and the personnel involved clearly understood the strategic vision and associated goals and objectives needed to attain desired results? Did that organization possess leaders in charge of each department that were capable of clearly articulating their information needs? Were the correct capability sets being used to ensure each person supporting the organization were able to perform their part, while simultaneously being proactive to gather info required to support anticipated actions/issues? I agree that today we may have more sophisticated tools, but the basic information needs remain relatively the same. Those that don't know what they need to know often establish complicated solutions. They try a little of everything until they stumble into what they need. I hope I did not hear you say that technology is the solution. I hope you said technology is a tool, only if people know how and when to use it. Great discussion!



Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA