KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Re: Curious about Knowledge Management


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Daan de Koning on September 19, 1999 at 15:44:07:

In Reply to: Re: Curious about Knowledge Management posted by Vaughn P. Fox on September 11, 1999 at 23:29:03:

I hope (trust) that the energy I put in this posting on KM is not misdirected! ;-)

I think the crucial statement in you posting is:

"Instead, there needs to be a focus on information provided in a form that promotes knowledge required to attain the level of "understanding" people need before they make decisions."

I agree that anyone managing knowledge should be concerned with the provision of the right information in order to (be able to or enable others to) act, decide and perform. But what is the right form of information to provide such knowledge? Is that covered in IM?

The decision making processes in organisations seem to be less (much less) structured, and therefor not as stable and predictible as predefined tasks. The latter being the primairy domain of IM.
It is more difficult to gather, combine and filter the data and interpret the data to form information for the more complex business processes. The traditional theories, systems, tools, methods of IM no longer apply to handle this increased complexity. Energy focused on more improving complex business processes can not be misdirected.

Another of your statements is important:
"Recognizing information needed to attain understanding that is linked to key decisions would allow people to increase efficiency in any organization. "

You presuppose that information (and therefor information management) is sufficient for key decisions, but is it?

Decision making processes in organisations have much to do with people, interacting, responding to one another. Are these "psychological" aspects covered suffiently with IM?

My idea is that Information Management, IT service providers, IS departments, but also business managers and consultants, are just at the beginning of understanding organisations and the capabilities of new technologies in organisations. My idea is that 'Knowledge Management' (the two words) is capable of attracting (luring) critical people with interesting ideas and tons of experience in a wide variety of areas to one and the same place to share their thoughts and opinions.

Even at days where I find nothing of immediate use, the energy put into it was worth it.

Daan de Koning


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA