KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Seeking Posting Advice on a Unified Theory of Knowledge


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by mike cahill on September 01, 1999 at 13:43:15:

This is a request for posting advice on a Unified Theory of Knowledge (UTK):

I am a researcher specializing in KM data bases and KM. I have done a brief series of postings in the last few days introducing a UTK.

In the last year our institute has made a series of discoveries about the structure of explicit knowledge that we believe will significantly advance the theoretical understanding of KM, and provide a new basis for a UTK. Our research springs from the Hegelian tradition of aggressive and dynamic deconstruction. These discoveries appear to have immediate application in the philosophy of science, logic, medicine and several computer fields including enterprise level software, e.g. ERP, CRM, SCM, KM, etc.

A very brief overview of our work is that we have discovered new Knowledge Objects that allow one to granulize and quantify any explicit knowledge from the Big Bang down to the Quark, and from the oil refinery to the human child. We have developed methods of mapping these objects into n Space. We have produced motion pictures of massive sets of such objects, and we have done preliminary work on applying these techniques to implicit knowledge.

We plan to publish a summary paper later this fall for wide distribution but wish now to gain the advantage of rapid peer review and aggressive criticism by publishing a series of mini-papers over the next few weeks on the web or Usenet. We will publish the mini papers on @BRINT, but I am concerned that the academic community is not well represented here, so we may not benefit from the sophisticated combative treatment we expect from this quarter. We would appreciate your advice on the following:

1) In which @BRINT forum should we post?

2) Should we cross post to other web sites or newgroups?

3) General suggestions on how to pull academic elements into this review effort?

Thank you in advance,

mike cahill


Follow Ups:


Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]


Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA