KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Jones The Absurd


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Martyn R Jones on August 03, 1999 at 04:57:50:

In Reply to: Re: Knowledge, Format and Quality posted by P. Richard Hansen on August 02, 1999 at 20:05:39:

Hello,

Most people most of the time believe their point of view is the right point of view.

Let's put it another way - you have it your way and I'll have it my way with a side order of fries.

You may, on the other hand, can hold your own opinions, even contradictory opinions, if you wish, if you must and if you can.

For example, based on project experience I could claim:

I can manage knowledge because I can get access to knowledge and I can get people to divulge that knowledge - some of the time and in some circumstances. If I can prove that KM can make a company generally smarter then I will.

If, the other hand, institutional learning is a waste of time then maybe we need to look at the whole principle of formal education and the ensuing results that it sometimes produces.

I can also access information, data, symbols (visual, aural, tactil etc.) - quite often and in a lot of circumstances.

Now I also get the impression that anything I write will be seen by some people as merely and at best "noisy data", too bad for me I would guess, as I don't have enough time to tailor my responses to the minute needs of everyone.

Although, curiously enough, I also find that the prevalent need to emphasize the importance of information and at the same time to deny other interpretations of the meaning of knowledge ( by the way, I almost invariably refer to knowledge in the business context ) to be flawed by the apparent necessity to hold onto to the "information factor" as if it were a life affirming principle.

That is, you say:

>>> explicit knowledge is information, regardless the format and wheter I understand it or not!.

If one does not understand it - something - then could it rational to call it knowledge, information, data, a physical symbol system, a pattern, something unrecognizable or something else.

Regards,

Martyn R Jones




Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA