Posted by Lauri Grohn on July 22, 1999 at 03:11:58:

In Reply to: Re: Misconceptions about "social constructions". posted by P. Richard Hansen on July 21, 1999 at 21:29:50:

>The point is if the agreed knowledge has a
>function in the society where it was constructed.

That is relevant concerning sosiology but not
relevant to physics.

>And as a matter of fact both Bohr (who is a
>countryman of mine)and Einstein both talks
>about objectivity versus subjectivity,

Both Bohr and Einstein were bad philosophers
of science, concerning quantum mechanics.
Bohr did conclusion that were only opinions.
Einsteins didn't want to change his beliefs
which were wrong.

>But through my empirical work I have come
>to realize that the viewpoints and the
>conclusions are actually very precise
>in their description of what i experience
>in the field

That book is about philosophy of science
concerning sosiology. Have you done
research work on sociology?

>It also describes the very reason why so
>many of us in this forum disagree on so
>many things,

My guess is that that book is about why
sosiologists disagree...

---

Follow Ups:

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: