KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


K-Management


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Rob Cayzer on July 20, 1999 at 11:12:06:

In Reply to: Re: Exactly my point! posted by P. Richard Hansen on July 20, 1999 at 07:40:53:

Hi,

The study of knowledge as a concept cannot be effective without the context of the organisation, as it would not capture: (1) motivations for undertaking such exercises (2) the synergistic benefits (3) the process/issues of developing a knowledge oriented system. The focus of discussion on KM should both knowledge and management - in the context of the organisation.

I don't think capturing knowledge in documents is the point. As Richard was eluding to, KM is primarily a people system. In an enterprise (or any organised entity), Knowledge Management is a further evolution in the struggle to survive/thrive in the fast-paced global business enviroment, where profit streams are derived directly from people's ideas (intellectual capital). The strongest proponents of KM are those who realise that ultimately they want to be learning ORGANISATIONS, by building on existing knowledge bases to come out with better products and services.

Knowledge systems, in whatever form, are primarily based on the precept that you want to capture these knowledge and share it so that it may be used, improved upon, etc. It may be on paper, plastic, metal, documents, phone, mail, discussion groups, BI, EDM, etc. It doesn't really matter. It's an organisational system. You may view it in terms of maturity models:

1) Static - company never changes (will eventually fail, I suppose)
2) BPR - company makes changes from time to time (but from a one-off / top-down / best practice approach)
3) Changed oriented - There exists a culture of change, however the direction of change may not be well placed (TQM)
4) Knowledge Based - The direction of change depend on capturing vital information and moving your products/services accordingly. However, it is managed by minority Knowledge Leaders (aka Knowledge mediators)
5) Learning Organisation - A significant part of the organisation is geared to growing and adapting

cheers,
rob.c.


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA