Posted by Lauri Grohn on July 12, 1999 at 09:44:36:

In Reply to: Re: Positioning KM ... or letting KM position itself posted by Martyn R Jones on July 12, 1999 at 08:39:31:

>However, I would still like to see the reasons
>"why Knowledge Management" is not also a science,
>I am not convinced, but keeping an open mind is
>part and parcel of the successful promotion of KM.
>Any takers on this one?

In addition of the reasons already mentioned,
here is a fatal one:

We still don't have any working knowledge accounting
system...

---

Follow Ups:

• Knowledge Accounting System Martyn R Jones 10:35:11 7/12/99 (6)
  • Why KM is not a science (yet?) Lauri Grohn 11:22:30 7/12/99 (5)
    • Re: Why KM is not a science (yet?) Kees de Vos 06:09:57 7/14/99 (3)
      • Re: Why KM is not a science (yet?) Lauri Grohn 08:19:51 7/14/99 (2)
        • Re: Why KM is not a science (yet?) Dan Cohen 17:20:23 7/14/99 (1)
          • Accounting or just statistics? Lauri Grohn 03:00:13 7/15/99 (0)
    • Reasons, Arguments, Shorthand and Anecdotes Martyn R Jones 13:54:48 7/12/99 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: