Posted by John Tieso on July 07, 1999 at 09:05:40:

In Reply to: Re: More on "Dangerous": Can "Dangerous" be "Fun"? posted by Yogesh Malhotra on July 06, 1999 at 21:35:35:

Dangerous can be 'fun', but can also be dangerous--although not, perhaps, in the form that has been described and argued.

Organizing, as Don described, has often been used to determine where in a process the artifacts--i.e. 'knowledge' is best retained for future reference. However, not all knowledge is gained through such an organized process.

Getting back to the original question--what is a CKO--it would seem that the CKO would need such organizational abilities, but should not be constrained by them--perhaps, the dangerous is fun comment of Yogesh bears this out.

JT

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: More on "Dangerous": Can "Dangerous" be "Fun"? Mezei 10:24:44 7/07/99 (5)
  • DIK Martyn R Jones 12:11:50 7/07/99 (4)
    • Re: DIK John Tieso 08:38:31 7/08/99 (3)
      • What makes a good CKO? Christina Cheng 02:43:15 7/11/99 (2)
        • Re: What makes a good CKO? John Tieso 11:09:15 7/14/99 (1)
          • Re: What makes a good CKO? CJSekhar 20:45:38 9/21/99 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: