Posted by Lauri Grohn on July 06, 1999 at 11:55:05:

In Reply to: Statement to this forum posted by Mezei on July 06, 1999 at 11:04:25:

Sorry, it was not my purpose to be arrogant.
When I commented this

>In this vein I submit that knowledge managers
>understand that data is organized into
>information, information organized into knowledge,
>organized into meaning.

I tried to say that I dont't believe to that
categorization. I also tried to say that
it is dangerous to demand for understanding
something that is not true being only illusion.

Why I think it is so? Because e.g. you can't
derive "meaning" from knowledge as you can't
derive ethics from anything either. Does
this help to clarify what I meant? Sorry
again about upsetting this forum.

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: Statement to this forum Mezei 12:49:00 7/06/99 (4)
  • knowledge touchpoints, different interpretation and views Martyn R Jones 18:06:46 7/06/99 (3)
    • Philosophy of KM? Lauri Grohn 03:51:57 7/07/99 (2)
      • Deep thought, shallow knowledge and interestig links Martyn R Jones 10:38:11 7/07/99 (1)
        • Please ignore the above post Martyn R Jones 10:43:13 7/07/99 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: