KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Re: What is the difference between information and explicit knowledge?


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Kees de Vos on July 01, 1999 at 18:29:08:

In Reply to: Re: What is the difference between information and explicit knowledge? posted by Dave Paloian on June 29, 1999 at 19:37:14:

Hi Dave,

thanks for the encouragement. Being an MBA and working for an ICT-management company I thought I should bring in the "Old" contingency principles for management to balance the fairly restrictive, differentiating and prescriptive system thinking which seems to dominate the field.

IMHO Best Practices tend to stand in the way of innovation. Nobody is encouraged to question its validity (Neadertaler Best Practise: "the best way to get from A to B is by foot", thanks to NOT having Best Practices the invented the wheel :-)). By taking away context, thinking about the Best Principle is encouraged.

It's intriguing to watch the analogies with the recent (and excellent) article in the Harvard Business Review (MArch/April 1999) Codification or Personification; what's your strategy for managing knowledge? It's a review of the strategies of the major consulting firms.

At my company we developed two focuses into our KM model which also seem to be fairly similar to this distinction (and your view on near and far transfer for that matter). The focus comes from asking yourself the question "Is the added value of my business rooted in my people or my processes?" If it is people the personification strategy prevails, if it is processes than a codification strategy might have the upper hand (mind you, they DO frequently overlap, its a focus, not a strict distinction).

In the case of your example, the process "windshield-wiping" is more or less leading in the search for A (not THE) best solution (contingency again). In the case of far tasks the person itself is an active part of the solution process hereby making explication/codification a fairly ineffective and inefficient approach. Halting the codification at the level of the best principle might prove more effective.

Does this comply to your views?


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA