KNOWLEDGE MGMT | FORUMS | EVENTS | HELP | PRESS ROOM | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Text mining


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Denham on June 29, 1999 at 18:34:03:

In Reply to: Re: KM & Notes posted by Laurence Smith on June 28, 1999 at 11:28:42:

Hi Laurence,

Autonomy, Beehive, Semio, Cartia and PC Docs / Fulcrum and to a lessor extent Verity, RetrievalWare, Dataware II, LexiQuest and Verge Insight are all positioned in this crowded niche somewhere between information retrieval and linguistic pattern discovery.

I like Autonomy for its seemless integration of automated hyperlinking, profiling and push, if you can live with the price tag. If you wish to focus on the text mining, I belive you will find Cartia to be more flexible, but you will have to be more hands on in terms of fine tuning the parameters. Semio does a good job with display and seems to have a slight edge with categorization. I have not had chance to compare all these tools on the same piece of text so it is difficult to judge.

Let's return to your needs! Do you wish to be alerted in real time to what is already in existance? do you wish to link to people or content?, Do you wish to have a efficient summary and index of your documents in your various repositories? are you looking for a neat navigation chart to burried gems?, do you wish to be altered to 'interesting' newsfeeds or new entries?, do you wish to find all places where a certain (defined & known) idea / concept / term is used? I'm sure you will appreciate each of these has different tool requirements and then there is always a question of what formats will the tool handle? what effort and expense you wish to put into user training?

In spite of all the hype, I think you will find there is no magic here. You will get improved results over the long haul by balancing tools with cognitive practices & processes, e.g. building ontologies, mapping personal connections, making deliberate distinctions. One last word, if you can afford to wait, Microsoft has more linguists employed than all the other firms combined. Look to see their Site Server technology come along very quickly.


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA