|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Yogesh Malhotra on February 14, 1999 at 16:32:25:
In Reply to: Re: Definition of Knowledge and Knowledge "Experts" posted by John C Anderl on February 13, 1999 at 00:33:49:
Going back to the notion of "knowledge" as 'justified belief,' one may like to consider its bases of justification. Such justification about "it" may arise from various criteria, such as:
a) Everyone agrees about it: so it is a "given truth"
b) It has been empirically proven and it is unchanging with shifting time and context
c) It has never been questioned: everyone assumes that it is a "given truth"
d) No one cares about it: hence it is assumed as a "given truth"
e) The powers-that-be have determined that it is the "given truth"
f) Everyone hears [from media channels and other 'filters'] that it is the "given truth"
g) All speakers at the conference said so ;-), so it is the "given truth"
h) All vendors of technology said so ;-), so it is the "given truth"Your example of "earth as round" would be based on most of the above criteria. However, the issue that may be of interest is that of "truths" as being universal truths: that are unassailable with shifts in times and contexts. The "truth" of "push technologies" and other similar new inventions are often a combination of hype and reality - only in the longer run can one determine the ratio of the two in the mix of 'messy' reality.
Considering a popular example about the 'in thing' in children's toys category, we are hearing that many are ga ga about the "furby" this year [resulting in a whole array of such dolls in various shapes and forms], last year it was the Power Ranger [especially the white one], and years' before we had the "Cabbage Patch" doll and the "Pet Rock." The question is if the success of any gizmo this year can imply that it will be a similar success next year. One can not say with certainty, because future in many such cases is indeterminate.
In sum, most fundamental and statistical facts may remain unchanged [although given the systemic nature of natural forces that shape the universe, after many years if earth will still be round or if it will be still in existence is a moot issue]. However, within the foreseeable time horizon - of next year, next decade and perhaps next millenium - we anticipate to observe radically changing nature of organizations [as we know about them] and related information processing systems, control and performance systems. Simultaneously, we also anticipate to see changing nature of what we think about in terms of work, leisure and other aspects of human life. [Will TV still remain 'in' or 'out' - that is the big question facing the mega-networks who are hedging their bets by investing, colluding and merging with Internet networks and allied services.]
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA