WWW VL KM | THINK TANK | READ & RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | THINK TANK FAQ | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


'Knowledge' - Please tell me its cost and selling price

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Umesh on July 25, 1997 at 12:49:24:

The intangible asset 'knowledge' seems to be the most important raw material for the production of any product and probably the hottest 'commodity' to sell given the kind of attention focused on it in the academic world and the fast growing interest in the commercial world.
The books 'Intellectual Capital' by Thomas Stewart and 'Knowledge Management' by Dr.Sveiby are excellent foundations to this new concept. And the Swedes, characterized by such companies as Skandia, have already taken positive steps to attempt to create a tangible value to it. But the world at large will be impacted only when the value of 'knowledge', which Dr.Sveiby in his book illustrates very well in form of a balance sheet, gets sub-divided into plausible numbers into three segments ( and a combination of the three) of the invisible asset in his balance sheet.

It is a difficult task and is dependent on Industries/Companies and strategies. But I think there should be more effort put in trying to develop a map and place industries and companies on it based on the extent of 'knowledge' required as a raw material or as a product or service for present and future market conditions. It is definitely not directly proportional to the number of PCs' or the number of post graduates in the company.

Are there any reports/papers on this issue ?

Finally will the concept 'knowledge' follow the principles of the stock market. Suppose every commercial enterprise invests in the concept 'knowledge'. Will it then adjust its price according to the efficient capital market rules or will its value continue to appreciate?

My rationale for this kind of reasoning comes from the typical depreciable ( or sometimes appreciable) value of a tangible asset.

Umesh


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA

WWW VL KM | THINK TANK | READ & RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | THINK TANK FAQ | @BRINT