KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY | DISCUSSION | BUSINESS RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | HELP & FAQs | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Boundary objects


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Denham on July 05, 1998 at 19:51:21:

In Reply to: Re: KM & PM posted by Brian Wilkinson on July 05, 1998 at 15:07:30:

Brian,

Boundary objects are the 'documents' that carry meaning across departments or functions. In a bank this would be an individual account. It would be processed by accounting, auditing, marketing each looking at the imformation and applying their interpretation. The concept comes from John Seely Brown of Xerox PARC and is described in a number of his presentations and artciles the latest I have to hand is J. S. brown & P. Duguid, 1998 Organizing Knowledge, California Management Review 40 (3) 90-111.

There are a number of solutions for hooking Notes to PM engines, it depends on the degree of document control you desire. I'm aware of combinations of Notes & Documentum, Notes and Novasoft, Notes and MS Project links. I'm sure you could program Notes to do some of the PM reasoning but that would be the hard way and you would loose out on the incremental functional improvemenst available (and the R&D) that is going into the PM specific products. Notes can be used to capture the electronic conversations for your virtual teams and it could serve as the repository for the meeting minutes and e-mails where the teams are closer together. The trick is abstracting the learnings and making dure these are available for learning in future projects. So far the best way I know to do this is to make it an explicit responsibility of the project administrator. I'm skeptical of 'learning histories' as they are subject to NIHS (not invented here syndrome). It has proved difficult to get new project memebers interested and motivated to access and learn past projects history.


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA

KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY | DISCUSSION | BUSINESS RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | HELP & FAQs | @BRINT