KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY | DISCUSSION | BUSINESS RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | HELP & FAQs | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Interaction rates


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Denham on April 02, 1998 at 07:04:01:

In Reply to: Re: What KM is yours? posted by Tom Sudman on April 01, 1998 at 21:27:53:

Thanks Tom, you are correct there is always interaction, what makes a difference is the rate. If the interaction is via iterations of 'static' web pages it looses some of the urgency and the energy that we have in a conversation, even an asynchronous exchange such as this. I'm fasinated at the synergy introduced when you can move between different representational forms. A fully interactive critique of mindmaps adds another level to the 'conversation', imagine we were talking and working the sound bytes, we would be able to search, cluster, edit, move, copy, archive and still think with our hands free!

The magic for me happens between conversation and publishing. If there were a seemless way to integrate these genre we would be a whole lot closer to KM that currently don't you think? I'm interested in tools to help you visualize conversations, extract essential concepts, cross-correlate posts and abstract from conversation logs. The power of dialog to change alignments, mental models and behavior, record comitments and elicit collaboration needs to be combined with the ubiquity of the pulished word the clarity of graphics and the convenience of alerts. Too often we settle for either one or the other. Too often the learning is personal when it could be the whole group or critique is one to one and the remainder is denied a chance to improve. Too often the call is for access when what is needed is interaction. Too often we think monitoring others when the core value is relationship and sharing.

So Tom as you move around do knowledge dynamics not play an increasingly important role?




Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA

KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY | DISCUSSION | BUSINESS RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | HELP & FAQs | @BRINT