|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by Tom Sudman on March 26, 1998 at 16:42:20:
In Reply to: Addition posted by Robbert Northolt on March 26, 1998 at 10:22:42:
Robbert, the difficulty is to measure and reward the correct things. If you reward quanity without some way factoring in quality you are going to get noise sharing. If one person in a knowledge community says little but what was said planted the seed to the group for a great idea that leads to enormous competitive advantage who gets what.
We are doing some work in group directed evaluation and awards( ie the community makes the determination) for one of our clients that is starting to look interesting but too early for any flaws to show up. But it is ahead of the game so far.
Tom
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA