|
Channels: BUSINESS · MANAGEMENT · STRATEGY · TECHNOLOGY · IT SECURITY · SYSTEMIC RISK · FINANCE · TRADING · E-BIZ
Services: FINANCIAL RISK · MONEY SANTA · KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT · REFERENCE · NEWS · JOBS · PORTALS · DIRECTORY Community: JOIN NOW · GLOBAL NETWORK · EVENT CALENDAR · SUCCESS GIVEAWAY · GIVING TO BRINT · ABOUT BRINT · HELP · |
|
Posted by Yogesh Malhotra on March 17, 1998 at 13:35:37:
In Reply to: Re: On 'Common Sense' vs. 'Shared Sense' posted by TomSudman on March 16, 1998 at 11:56:48:
Tom,
The emphasis of 'language' as the source of 'meaning' reminds me of the information-processing view that is characteristic of most computerized information systems. Simultaneously, the psychological notion of a human mind as 'tabula rasa' (blank slate) on which meaning is enacted primarily by the external symbols or images seems incomplete in various respects - both theoretical and pragmatic.
Hence, adding to your point about 'conversation,' 'communication,' and 'meaning' - conversation, or more appropriately 'dialog,' is essential for surfacing the 'meanings' that are embedded in the various implicit 'theories of action' and explicit elaborations embedded in various languages. I recall we had some earlier communications on this forum that are relevant to this point.
Yogesh
- Re: On 'Common Sense' vs. 'Shared Sense' Jay Reay 16:51:52 3/17/98 (2)
- Re: On 'Common Sense' vs. 'Shared Sense' Jay Reay 10:01:25 3/18/98 (0)
- Your final paragraph says it all Tom Sudman 17:41:44 3/17/98 (0)
- Re: On 'Common Sense' vs. 'Shared Sense' Jay Reay 16:48:10 3/17/98 (0)
- Re: On 'Common Sense' vs. 'Shared Sense' Jay Reay 16:47:43 3/17/98 (0)
- Re: On 'Common Sense' vs. 'Shared Sense' Jay Reay 16:47:25 3/17/98 (0)
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
|
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2010, BRINT Institute LLC, New York, USA