Posted by Bob Guns on March 17, 1998 at 11:44:55:

In Reply to: Re: Role of the Chief Knowledge Officer posted by Mezei on March 09, 1998 at 18:39:25:

Hi Don,

Good point. What is really needed is an architecture for this field. I have been noodling around the boundaries and beginning of this architecture, and need to do a lot more work at it. The architecture will help me be more helpful to my clients. I would never suggest that it would be a universal, generic architecture. However, it is `dirty work' that has to be done for somebody to be helpful and make a valued contribution in this field. Otherwise, we'll all be sitting around 10 years from now still debating how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Don, I appreciate your insights into this field. If you, or others, want to `play' at a beginning architecture, let's do it! And it doesn't matter if we all agree, it will help, I am sure, to clarify our own thinking as we proceed.
What do you think?

Bob

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: Role of the Chief Knowledge Officer Mezei 00:20:30 3/19/98 (3)
  • Re: Role of the Chief Knowledge Officer Robert Noakes 01:52:56 5/16/98 (0)
  • Re: Role of the Chief Knowledge Officer Debbie Jackson 07:10:25 4/16/98 (0)
  • Re: Role of the Chief Knowledge Officer Bob Patterson 13:59:23 3/31/98 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: