KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY | DISCUSSION | BUSINESS RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | HELP & FAQs | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Re: On Sense, Sensibility and Nonsense


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Craig Maudlin on March 16, 1998 at 12:40:07:

In Reply to: Re: On Sense, Sensibility and Nonsense posted by Mezei on March 15, 1998 at 20:23:48:

One problem with reaching for absolutes is the existing widespread usage of the terms: data, information and knowledge. Even if one were able to perfect absolute definitions, it seems unlikely that the use of all other definitions could be completely extinguished. A practical consequence would be the ongoing need to qualify one's use of the terms -- just as we need do today.

Consider the computer I'm typing on now. Certainly it contains a great quantity of data. I find it useful for to speak of the information it contains and occasionally I speak of certain things it 'knows' how to do.

Am I misspeaking or simply making an error whenever I talk about the knowledge within my machine? Perhaps, but I think there is a useful distinction to be made here and if I'm persuaded not to use the term 'knowledge' for this, then I'll be looking for a new term I can use for this same distinction.

I think the distinction I find useful to make with respect to the information and knowledge contained in my machine is the very same distinction I find useful to make with respect to people. Let me hasten to add that the TYPES of information and knowledge are very different in the two cases. But I think the DISTINCTIONS I make are the same.

This, then, is why I don't think we can really expect to eliminate context and come up with absolute terminology. We have a natural tendency to use a given term whenever we recognize the pattern that constitutes the distinction we associate with the term. Our minds just seem to unconsciously operate by recognizing such patterns whereever they occur.



Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Business Processes] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA

KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY | DISCUSSION | BUSINESS RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | HELP & FAQs | @BRINT