KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY | DISCUSSION | BUSINESS RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | HELP & FAQs | @BRINT


About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise Here |
Welcome to the World's No. 1 Resource for Business Technology Management and Knowledge Management
@Brint.com
SEARCH [HELP]

Knowledge Management Think Tank is now: BRINT Global Knowledge Network.


Bits/Bytes and data/information/knowledge management


[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]

Posted by Mezei on February 28, 1998 at 14:41:23:

In Reply to: Re: Knowledge Management and Learning Organizations posted by Robbert Northolt on February 27, 1998 at 03:23:28:

I've been wracking my brain trying to answer that very question(s). A couple of thoughts...

- there is a fundamental duality to information, at least there should be in theory. I came across a related note in Thomas Stewart's 'intellectual capital' book which explains that this duality has to do with the logic of applying information, vs the information we can decipher via that application. In other words, there is explicit information which makes calculations possible to do again and again, and there is the transparancy that studying this same information creates. So the logic is explicit info, while the transparancy is tacit. We can reinterpret existing information that is responsible for set processes, making that information tacit or malleable. Or we can watch it at work, making it purley explicit.

- as far as data, data is either a '1' or a '0'. So you have the 1 is the binary on, and the 0 is the binary off. On implies movement = tacit. Off implies non-movement = explicit. This is getting down to brass tacks, but I'm trying to map the whole spectrum.

So, 1's and 0's get the process going. There's little leeway towards understanding how data differs much in a taict or explicit mode, but once it moves from being purely explicit as a bit and becomes more open to interpretation as a byte, then the hardware can interpret that byte as explicit information. Thus we have the tacit data/explicit info overlap. When information evolves to the tacit level from the explicit level, it becomes possible to interpret it from the explicit knowledge persepective. And so on. I obviously have to think about it some more....

Don


Follow Ups:



Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

Subject:

Message:

[ ] [ Post Followup ] [ Discussion Forums ] [ Discussion Index ]


Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management] [How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough] [KM for E-Business Performance] [Does KM=IT? Not!] [Other Articles and Interviews]



Top of Page

BRINT: 'Your Survival Network for The Brave New World Of Business'tm
Recommended by Business Week, Fortune, Wall Street Journal, Fast Company,
Business 2.0, Computerworld, Information Week, CIO Magazine, KM World,
Los Angeles Times, New York Times, and hundreds of other worldwide publications.

About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise

Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles

Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA

KNOWLEDGE LIBRARY | DISCUSSION | BUSINESS RESEARCH | ANNOUNCE | HELP & FAQs | @BRINT