|
Services: Knowledge Portals · Knowledge Map · Knowledge Network · Book of Knowledge · NEWS· INFORMATION
Channels: General Business · Business Technology · E-Business · Knowledge Management Community: Join the Network! · Global Network · Events Calendar · Executive Jobs |
|
Posted by David Fry on May 24, 2004 at 07:11:27:
In Reply to: Re: Who Should Own KM? posted by Shahnawaz Khan on May 23, 2004 at 05:27:04:
I accept all these as valid issues.
We want to integrate it into the work processes; we also insist KM initiatives support the strategic goals of the organization; and, as Learning & Development, we are keenly aware that extracting and reusing knowledge is, at its core, a learning event and, therefore, people centric.
However, without an organizational steward (folks in the organization who's coordinated function is to propel, strategize, market, and guide KM, it won't go anywhere. That is the crux of my question: Which department makes the most sense as the "Owner" or "Steward" of KM?
Thanks for your responses so far.
Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums
Download Our Articles and Interviews
[Guru Interviews] [Real Time Enterprise Business Processes] [IT Users Motivation] [IT Users Commitment] [Commitment and Motivation] [Inquiring Organizations] [Social Influences] [Customer Relationship Management] [Supply Chain Management] [IT Adoption and Utilization] [Managing and Measuring Knowledge Assets] [The Real Competitive Advantage] [Why IT and KM Systems Fail] [Myths About Expertise Management]
[How 'Best Practices' Become 'Worst Practices'] [Beyond Information Ecology to Knowledge Ecosystems] [Knowledge Exchanges and Social Networks] [Why Expert Systems Aren't Enough]
[KM for E-Business Performance]
[Does KM=IT? Not!]
[Other Articles and Interviews]
About BRINT | News About BRINT | Help & FAQs | Users Guide | Advertise
Make BRINT your Start Page | | Link to BRINT | Submit Articles
Terms of Use | Privacy | © Copyright 1994-2007, BRINT Institute, New York, USA