Posted by Jurgens Pieterse on February 13, 1998 at 03:19:22:

In Reply to: Enterprise Architecture & Knowledge posted by S.Haggard on February 09, 1998 at 17:38:33:

Hi

I am working for Q-Data Business Consulting.
A South-African based company. We have been intensively involved in the last four years in developing enterprise architectures and has recently expanded our initiative to include our business/enterprise architecture skills into a wider knowledge managment framework. Our approach to an enterprise architecture is a bit different from the Zachman framework in the sense that it is more focused on a business perspective than an Information Technology perspective.

We believe that the enterprise architecture is the ideal place to keep meta-knowledge and subsistance knowledge.On top of the enterprise architecture functions an instance architecture that deals primarily with instances within the business domain. Our enterprise architecture fits into the knowledge management domain because we have the ability to present knowledge graphically and then publish it onto a companies intranet.

• value creation and cyclic progression

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: Enterprise Architecture & Knowledge Susan Peekna 20:13:15 2/15/98 (4)
  • Re: Enterprise Architecture & Knowledge Yogesh Malhotra 15:39:58 2/16/98 (3)
    • Re: Enterprise Architecture & Knowledge Susan K. Peekna 17:31:34 3/29/98 (0)
    • Re: Enterprise Architecture & Knowledge Martyn R Jones 04:11:47 2/17/98 (1)
      • Re: Enterprise Architecture & Knowledge John Tieso 10:10:48 7/23/98 (0)
• Re: Enterprise Architecture & Knowledge Yogesh Malhotra 10:09:23 2/14/98 (3)
  • Re: Enterprise Architecture & Knowledge Jurgens Pieterse 10:49:28 2/18/98 (0)
  • Re: Enterprise Architecture & Knowledge Jurgens Pieterse 10:21:03 2/18/98 (1)
    • Re: Editorial Policy Yogesh Malhotra 11:03:23 2/18/98 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Knowledge Management Think Tank (New)

  

 Subject: 

Message: