Posted by Andreas A. Grønbekk on November 05, 2003 at 16:19:03:

In Reply to: Know-How posted by Lauri Gröhn on November 05, 2003 at 03:22:27:

You are correct regarding Dreyfus talking about know how and not using the term "tacit knowledge". So I may conclude that you are saying tacit knowledge is not part of know how?
Martin Heidegger writes about semi conscious, non unarticulated knowledge in several notes in the 50's and 60's. He never mention "tacit knowledge" (of course). Are you then saying he is not talking about the same issues that "tacit knowledge" covers?
My impression is that you want "tacit knowledge" to be the basic term in these discussions and not questioning wether it is a good term and definetly not being able to give any specific definition of the consept of "tacit knowledge". That is one reason we are having only semi-philosophical discussions and no practical knowledge sharing in this community.

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: Know-How sam 23:56:28 11/30/03 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Name: 

  E-Mail: 

 Subject: 

Message: