Posted by Lauri Gröhn on October 16, 2003 at 09:32:13:

In Reply to: Re: posted by Matt M on October 16, 2003 at 08:07:56:

"What are the 'raw materials' of a new idea? "

Normally known facts in a new combination.
I have never heard of and idea having no
earlier knowledge behind it. How the brains
are processing that facts is not well known.

Yes, some could say that also "tacit knowledge"
is needed, but that is only giving a name
to something. Giving a name is not an
explanation. Inventing magic words is called
pseudoscience.

---

Follow Ups:

• Re: "birth of knowledge" Matt M 09:55:38 10/16/03 (11)
  • The cult of "tacit knowledge" Lauri Gröhn 12:26:37 10/16/03 (10)
    • Re: The cult of "tacit knowledge" Sebastián Miralles Acuña 16:13:28 10/16/03 (9)
      • Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Lauri Gröhn 00:11:01 10/17/03 (8)
        • Re: Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Sebastián Miralles Acuña 09:07:35 10/17/03 (7)
          • Re: Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Lauri Gröhn 09:42:51 10/17/03 (6)
            • Re: Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Sebastián Miralles Acuña 10:09:44 10/17/03 (5)
              • Re: Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Lauri Gröhn 11:59:10 10/17/03 (4)
                • Re: Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Sebastián Miralles Acuña 12:04:38 10/17/03 (3)
                  • Re: Piaget adn "tacit knowledge" Lauri Gröhn 12:21:09 10/17/03 (2)
                    • Online Pharmacy 23:21:47 02/11/04 (0)
                    • test editor 13:13:12 10/17/03 (0)

---

Click Here to Post Follow Up in New Forums

    Name: 

  E-Mail: 

 Subject: 

Message: